Measurement of Environmental Performance Indicators for Ikm Batik "Ka" Rembang Using Iepms, Ahp and Omax Methods Pengukuran Indikator Kinerja Lingkungan Ikm Batik “Ka” Rembang Dengan Metode Iepms, Ahp Dan Omax

Main Article Content

Nuzulia Khoiriyah
Wiwiek Fatmawati

Abstract

Environmental performance evaluation of IKM Batik KA is carried out by combining 3 methods: Integrated Environment Performance Measurement System (IEPMS), Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Objective Matrix (OMAX). Of the 32 Key to Environment Performance Indicators (KEPI) submitted to IKM, 18 quantitative indicators and 14 qualitative indicators were selected to be assessed. All KEPI have almost the same importance in the range of 0 - 10%. The results of calculations with OMAX and the Traffic light system assessment show that there are 6 KEPI at the green level, 2 KEPI at the yellow level and 18 KEPI at the red level. There are only 2 KEPI, namely indicators I2 and D1 which have a high level of importance and are at the green level, which means that the desired targets and achievements are synchronized. The total achievement value of KEPI in the OMAX calculation is at 3.31, it is included in the red category, meaning that the environmental performance of the KA Batik IKM is still bad and must be corrected immediately.

Article Details

How to Cite
Khoiriyah, N., & Fatmawati , W. (2021). Measurement of Environmental Performance Indicators for Ikm Batik "Ka" Rembang Using Iepms, Ahp and Omax Methods. PROZIMA (Productivity, Optimization and Manufacturing System Engineering), 3(2), 14-20. Retrieved from https://prozima.umsida.ac.id/index.php/prozima/article/view/1269
Section
Articles

References

[1] Abdullah, Aftina Damasari, Aviasti, and Nur Rahman Assad. 2017. “Pengukuran Kinerja Lingkungan Menggunakan Pendekatan Integrated Environment Performance Measurement System Di.” In Prosiding Seminar Dan Konferensi Nasional IDEC 2017, 8–9.
[2] Hanafi, Jessica. 2015. “Menuju Manufaktur Berkelanjutan Di Indonesia : Tantangan Dan Kesempatan.” Jurnal Teknik Industri 17 (2): 123–32. https://doi.org/10.9744/jti.17.2.123.
[3] Kurniawan, M Wawan, P Purwanto, S Sudarno. 2017. “Strategi Pengelolaan Air Limbah Sentra Umkm Batik Yang Berkelanjutan Di Kabupaten Sukoharjo.” Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan 11 (2): 62. https://doi.org/10.14710/jil.11.2.62-72.
[4] Mas’idah, Eli, Nuzulia Khoiriyah, and Teguh Samudra. 2018. “Pengukuran Kinerja Perusahaan Dengan Metode Integrated PErformance Measuremen System (IPMAS) Dan Objective Matrix (OMAX) (Studi Kasus : PT. NADIRA PRIMA.” In Prosiding SNST 9 FT UNWAHAS, 24–29.
[5] Rachawati, Silvia, and Udisubakti Ciptomulyono. 2010. “Pengukuran Kinerja Lingkungan Dengan Metode Analytical HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP) DAN INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENT PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM (IEPMS) PADA PT. CAMPINA ICE CREAM INDUSTRY.” In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Manajemen Teknologi XI, A-26-1-A-26-8.
[6] Wahyuni, Hana Catur, Prodi Teknik Industri, Fakultas Teknik, and Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo. 2017. “Implementasi Metode Objective Matrix (OMAX) Untuk Pengukuran Produktivitas Pada PT.ABC.” Prozima 1 (1): 17–21. https://doi.org/10.21070/prozima.v1i1.702.
[7] Wardhana, Daniel AK, and Heru Prastawa. 2017. “ANALISIS PEMILIHAN SUPPLIER DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS.” Https://Ejournal3.Undip.Ac.Id IV (6): 39–46.