Clustering-Allocation Model Under Risk, and Emissions Factors: Evidence from an Indonesian Region

Pipit Sari Puspitorini

doi:10.21070/prozima.v8i2.1718

(1) * Pipit Sari Puspitorini Universitas Islam Majapahit
Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/prozima.v8i2.1718

Abstract

This study contributes to risk-based location-allocation problems by constraining time and emergency medical services (EMS) carbon emissions. During the COVID-19 pandemic, this study develops a location set covering the problem of implementing ambulance allocation to optimize opening new facilities and the cluster with the highest emission value in heritage cities. This study also presents an integer linear program considering risk, time, and carbon emissions at three facilities with demand locations. The model was also validated using two cluster methods, K-means clustering and Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering, with Python software and Google Collaboratory machine learning (GCC). The findings revealed the opening of three facilities and clusters with potential points, with the highest emission values at M₃ (0.575% (kg). M_2. potential point, with a value of 5832 represents the highest risk. Furthermore, the validation results indicate that the distance significantly total energy consumption (BTU) and carbon emissions (kg). This study ignores the vehicle category. It can be used as a reference by decision-makers by considering these parameters and making a clear contract with a third party in ambulance procurement for humanitarian logistics. The model will help provide insight into another region's relevant emergency medical center. Furthermore, research can anticipate strategies to deal with pandemic outbreaks.

References

X. Taouktsis and C. Zikopoulos, “A decision-making tool for the determination of the distribution center location in a humanitarian logistics network,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 238, no. PC, p. 122010, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122010.

I. Alturki and S. Lee, “A systematic survey of multicriteria models in humanitarian logistics,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., vol. 102, no. September 2023, p. 104209, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104209.

Y. Yang, Y. Yin, D. Wang, J. Ignatius, T. C. E. Cheng, and L. Dhamotharan, “Distributionally robust multi-period location-allocation with multiple resources and capacity levels in humanitarian logistics,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 305, no. 3, pp. 1042–1062, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2022.06.047.

UN OCHA, “Global Humanitarian Overview 2022,” 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.18356/9789210012423.

V. Raja Sreedharan, V. Kek, M. Dhanya, S. Anjali, and P. Arunprasad, “Understanding the role of logistics in humanitarian operations: Key findings and analysis from literatures,” Int. J. Logist. Syst. Manag., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 463–494, 2020, doi: 10.1504/IJLSM.2020.108961.

B. M. Beamon and B. Balcik, “Performance measurement in humanitarian relief chains,” Int. J. Public Sect. Manag., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 4–25, 2008, doi: 10.1108/09513550810846087.

H. Dangi, A. K. Bardhan, and A. S. Narag, “Humanitarian relief logistics: An exploratory study for need and importance of performance measurement system,” Int. J. Logist. Syst. Manag., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2012, doi: 10.1504/IJLSM.2012.048630.

M. S. M. Daud et al., “Humanitarian logistics and its challenges: The literature review,” Int. J. Supply Chain Manag., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 107–110, 2016.

P. S. Muttaqin, R. A. Finata, and A. A. Masturo, “Facility Location Model for Emergency Humanitarian Logistics Using Set Covering and Analytic Network Process (ANP) Method,” IPTEK J. Proc. Ser., vol. 0, no. 5, p. 49, 2020, doi: 10.12962/j23546026.y2020i5.7931.

A. S. Thomas, “Humanitarian Logistics : Enabling Disaster Response , Fritz Institute,” p. 17, 2008.

B. Balcik and B. M. Beamon, “Facility location in humanitarian relief,” Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 101–121, 2008, doi: 10.1080/13675560701561789.

P. Chaicharoenwut, J. Koiwanit, P. Changpetch, S. Buatongkue, and C. Yuangyai, “Integrating Spatial-Temporal Risk Factors for an Ambulance Allocation Strategy: A Case Study in Bangkok,” MATEC Web Conf., vol. 192, pp. 1–4, 2018, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201819201038.

Masdon, “Kebutuhan Ambulance Meningkat Selama Covid-19, DFSK Ubah Super Cab Jadi Ambulance Karoserian,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.ototrend.com/mob-trend/138-info-mobil/22472-2020-07-03c-17-29

M. S. Daskin, Network and Discrete Location Models, Algorithms, and Applications. New York: A Wiley-Interscienee Publication JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC. Canada, 1995.

B. Özkan, S. METE, E. ÇelLİK, and E. ÖZCEYLAN, “Gis-Based Maximum Covering Location Model in Times of Disasters: the Case of Tunceli,” Beykoz Akad. Derg., pp. 100–111, 2019, doi: 10.14514/byk.m.26515393.2019.sp/100-111.

W. Rusiawan, P. Tjiptoherijanto, E. Suganda, and L. Darmajanti, “System Dynamics Modeling for Urban Economic Growth and CO2 Emission: A Case Study of Jakarta, Indonesia,” Procedia Environ. Sci., vol. 28, no. SustaiN 2014, pp. 330–340, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2015.07.042.

G. Timothy, “Global Energy Review 2021,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/d0031107-401d-4a2f-a48b-9eed19457335/GlobalEnergyReview2021.pdf

M. Rahman et al., “Location-allocation modeling for emergency evacuation planning with GIS and remote sensing: A case study of Northeast Bangladesh,” Geosci. Front., vol. 12, no. 3, p. 101095, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.gsf.2020.09.022.

A. Sadeghi, F. Aros-Vera, H. Mosadegh, and R. YounesSinaki, “Social cost-vehicle routing problem and its application to the delivery of water in post-disaster humanitarian logistics,” Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev., vol. 176, no. August 2022, p. 103189, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2023.103189.

L. Shaw, S. K. Das, and S. K. Roy, “Location-allocation problem for resource distribution under uncertainty in disaster relief operations,” Socioecon. Plann. Sci., vol. 82, no. PA, p. 101232, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2022.101232.

H. Sun, J. Li, T. Wang, and Y. Xue, “A novel scenario-based robust bi-objective optimization model for humanitarian logistics network under risk of disruptions,” Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev., vol. 157, no. December 2021, p. 102578, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2021.102578.

N. M. Hashim, S. S. R. Shariff, and S. M. Deni, “Capacitated maximal covering location allocation problem during flood disaster,” Adv. Sci. Lett., vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 11545–11548, 2017, doi: 10.1166/asl.2017.10325.

P. Chaicharoenwut, J. Koiwanit, P. Changpetch, S. Buatongkue, and C. Yuangyai, “Integrating Spatial Risk Factors for an Ambulance Allocation Strategy: A Case Study in Bangkok,” in MATEC Web of Conferences 192; ICEAST 2018, 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201819201038.

Redaksi, “Kota Mojokerto PPKM Level 1,” Merdeka News, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.merdekanews.id/2021/11/kota-mojokerto-ppkm-level-1-wali-kota.html

A. M. Ikotun, A. E. Ezugwu, L. Abualigah, B. Abuhaija, and J. Heming, “K-means clustering algorithms: A comprehensive review, variants analysis, and advances in the era of big data,” Inf. Sci. (Ny)., vol. 622, pp. 178–210, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2022.11.139.

X. Wang and Y. Xu, “An improved index for clustering validation based on Silhouette index and Calinski-Harabasz index,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 569, no. 5, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/569/5/052024.